248 research outputs found

    The Influence of Coauthorship in the Interpretation of Multimodal Interfaces

    Get PDF
    This paper presents a model to codesign interpretively flexible artefacts. We present the case study of Beatfield, a multimodal system that allows users to control audiovisual material by means of tangible interaction. The design of the system was coauthored by individuals with different background and interests to encourage a range of difference interpretations. The capability of Beatfield to foster multiple interpretations was evaluated in a qualitative study with 21 participants. Elaborating on the outcome of this study, we present a new design model that can be used to stimulate heterogeneous interpretations of interactive artefacts

    Comparative assessment of angiotensin receptor blockers in different clinical settings

    Get PDF
    Cardiovascular and renal disease can be regarded as progressing along a sort of continuum which starts with cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, etc), evolves with progression of atherosclerotic lesions and organ damage, and then becomes clinically manifest with the major clinical syndromes (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, end-stage renal disease). The blood pressure control remains a fundamental mechanism for prevention of cardiovascular disease. The renin–angiotensin system is believed to play an important role along different steps of the cardiovascular disease continuum. Convincing evidence accumulated over the last decade that therapeutic intervention with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) is effective to slow down or block the progression of cardiovascular disease at different steps of the continuum, with measurable clinical benefits. However, despite the shared mechanism of action, each ARB is characterized by specific pharmacological properties that may influence its clinical efficacy. Indeed, important differences among available ARBs emerged from clinical studies. Therefore, generalization of results obtained with a specific ARB to all available ARBs may be misleading. The present review provides a comparative assessment of the different ARBs in their efficacy on major clinical endpoints along the different steps of the cardiovascular disease continuum

    Statins in acute coronary syndrome: very early initiation and benefits.

    Get PDF
    The use of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (statins) is associated with a marked reduction in morbidity and mortality in patients at high cardiovascular risk or with established cardiovascular disease. In the last decade, several randomized controlled studies have demonstrated the benefit of statins in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). These studies showed that use of statins in patients with ACS is associated with a significant reduction of the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines recommend (Level of Evidence 1A) the use of statin therapy before hospital discharge for all patients with ACS regardless of the baseline low-density lipoprotein. Although there is no consensus on the preferable time of administration of statins during ACS, some clinical trials and pooled analyses provided substantial support for the institution of an early initiation to improve strategies that target the pathophysiologic mechanism operating during myocardial infarction. In particular, recent findings suggested that the earlier the treatment is started after the diagnosis of ACS the greater the expected benefit. Experimental studies with statins in ACS have shown several other effects that could extend the clinical benefit beyond the lipid profile modification itself. In particular, statins demonstrated the ability to induce anti-inflammatory effects, modulate endothelium and inhibit the thrombotic signaling cascade. Given these recognized potential benefit, statins should conceivably modulate the pathophysiological processes involved in the very early phase of plaque rupture and coronary thrombosis

    Hypertension and Arrhythmias: A Clinical Overview of the Pathophysiology-Driven Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Hypertensive Patients

    Get PDF
    Because of demographic aging, the prevalence of arterial hypertension (HTN) and cardiac arrhythmias, namely atrial fibrillation (AF), is progressively increasing. Not only are these clinical entities strongly connected, but, acting with a synergistic effect, their association may cause a worse clinical outcome in patients already at risk of ischemic and/or haemorrhagic stroke and, consequently, disability and death. Despite the well-known association between HTN and AF, several pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the higher risk of AF in hypertensive patients are still incompletely known. Although several trials reported the overall clinical benefit of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors in reducing incident AF in HTN, the role of this class of drugs is greatly reduced when AF diagnosis is already established, thus hinting at the urgent need for primary prevention measures to reduce AF occurrence in these patients. Through a thorough review of the available literature in the field, we investigated the basic mechanisms through which HTN is believed to promote AF, summarising the evidence supporting a pathophysiology-driven approach to prevent this arrhythmia in hypertensive patients, including those suffering from primary aldosteronism, a non-negligible and under-recognised cause of secondary HTN. Finally, in the hazy scenario of AF screening in hypertensive patients, we reviewed which patients should be screened, by which modality, and who should be offered oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention

    Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy to advance multi-hazard disaster risk management

    Get PDF
    COVID-19 challenged all national emergency management systems worldwide overlapping with other natural hazards. We framed a ‘parallel phases’ Disaster Risk Management (DRM) model to overcome the limitations of the existing models when dealing with complex multi-hazard risk conditions. We supported the limitations analysing Italian Red Cross data on past and ongoing emergencies including COVID-19 and we outlined three guidelines for advancing multi-hazard DRM: (i) exploiting the low emergency intensity of slow-onset hazards for preparedness actions; (ii) increasing the internal resources and making them available for international support; (iii) implementing multi-hazard seasonal impact-based forecasts to foster the planning of anticipatory actions

    Aggressive blood pressure reduction in patients at high vascular risk: is it dangerous?

    Get PDF
    Summary Introduction The aim of this review was to summarize the current state of evidence regarding the optimal blood pressure goals in patients with high vascular risk. In particular, this review critically addresses the issue of the "J-curve" paradox – a hypothesis indicating that low treatment-induced blood pressure values are characterized by an increase, rather than a decrease, in the incidence of cardiovascular events. Materials and methods We reviewed evidence from studies published in peer-reviewed journals indexed in Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL that compared different BP goals. Results Post-hoc analyses of randomized trials specifically conducted to test the hypothesis of the "J-shaped curve" yielded conflicting results. However, trials directly comparing different blood pressure goals and meta-analyses showed that in-treatment blood pressure values below the usual goal of less than 140/90 mmHg improve outcomes in patients at increased vascular risk. Discussion The fear that an excessive reduction in blood pressure may be dangerous is inconsistent with the available data and probably conditioned by the adverse impact of other risk factors that may be more frequent in patients with low values of achieved blood pressure. The association between blood pressure reduction and cardiovascular risk seems to be linear and not J-shaped

    Drop-out rate from the liver transplant waiting list due to HCC progression in HCV-infected patients treated with direct acting antivirals.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND & AIM: concerns about an increased hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence rate following directly acting antiviral (DAA) therapy in cirrhotic patients with a prior complete oncological response have been raised. Data regarding the impact of HCV-treatment with DAAs on waiting list drop-out rates in patients with active HCC and HCV-related cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation (LT) are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HCV-HCC patients listed for LT between January 2015 and May 2016 at Padua Liver Transplant Centre were considered eligible for the study. After enrollment patients were divided into 2 groups, depending on whether they underwent DAAs treatment while awaiting LT or not. For each patient clinical, serological and virological data were collected. HCC characteristics were radiologically evaluated at baseline and during follow-up (FU). For transplanted patients, pathological assessment of the explants was performed and recurrence-rates were calculated. RESULTS: twenty-three patients treated with DAAs and 23 controls were enrolled. HCC characteristics at time of LT-listing were comparable between the 2 groups. Median FU was 10 and 7 months, respectively, during which 2/23 (8.7%) and 1/23 (4.3%) drop-out events due to HCC-progression were registered (p = 0.9). No significant differences in terms of radiological progression were highlighted (p = 0.16). Nine out of 23 cases (39%) and 14/23 (61%) controls underwent LT, and histopathological analysis showed no differences in terms of median number and total tumor volume of HCC nodules, tumor differentiation or microvascular invasion. During post-LT FU, 1/8 DAAs treated patient (12,5%) and 1/12 control (8,3%) experienced HCC recurrence (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Viral eradication does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of drop-out due to neoplastic progression in HCV-HCC patients awaiting LT

    Electrocardiography for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients with atrial fibrillation

    Get PDF
    Abstract Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy at electrocardiography (ECG) predicts incident atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the diagnostic performance of ECG for diagnosis of LV hypertrophy in patients with AF is still not well characterized. We analyzed 563 hypertensive patients enrolled in the Umbria-Atrial Fibrillation (Umbria-FA) registry, an ongoing prospective observational registry in patients with AF. All patients underwent ECG and standard echocardiography at their entry in the Register. Mean age was 74 years and 43% of patients were women. Prevalence of ECG-LV hypertrophy, defined by Perugia criterion corrected for body mass index, was 23%. Echocardiographic LV mass was the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of ECG-LV hypertrophy were 37.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.6–43.4), 90.0% (95% CI: 86.0–93.2) and 64.5% (95% CI: 60.4–68.3), respectively. Performance was comparable in patients with AF or sinus rhythm at ECG recording. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.622 (95% CI: 0.580–0.664) in the group with AF and 0.662 (95% CI: 0.605–0.720) in that with sinus rhythm (p = 0.266 for comparison). These data suggest that standard ECG is reliable for diagnosis of LV hypertrophy in patients with a history of AF, regardless of the presence of AF or sinus rhythm at the time of ECG recording
    • …
    corecore